Kindergeld — Germany’s statutory child benefit — is classified under German tax law as a tax rebate. That classification has consequences that most people receiving a repayment demand from the Familienkasse (the Family Benefits Office) do not anticipate. Repaying the amount demanded does not close the matter. The Familienkasse can and does refer cases to its own criminal tax unit, and what begins as an administrative dispute can become a criminal investigation for tax evasion under German law.
The transition happens faster than most people realize. Unreported changes — a child dropping out of university, completing vocational training, or taking up full-time employment — can be treated by the Familienkasse as grounds for a criminal referral. Once the authority identifies grounds for suspecting intentional conduct, the file moves to the criminal unit. The consequences can include substantial fines, an entry on the German certificate of good conduct (Führungszeugnis), and in serious cases a custodial sentence — with lasting effects on both professional and personal life.
Our lawyers for tax criminal law represent clients across Germany in proceedings before the Familienkasse and its criminal unit, with the goal of securing a discreet resolution before any charge is brought.
Why a Kindergeld Repayment Demand Is More Serious Than It Appears
Repayment demands typically arise because a change in the child’s circumstances was not reported to the Familienkasse at all, or not reported in time. Common triggers include a child leaving university before completing their degree, moving out of the family home, finishing a vocational training program, or taking up employment of more than 20 hours per week.
Under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act (Einkommensteuergesetz, EStG), parents and guardians have a direct legal obligation to notify the Familienkasse of any such changes. Informing other German authorities — the local residents’ registration office (Einwohnermeldeamt) or the employment agency (Jobcenter) — does not satisfy this obligation. The Familienkasse must be notified directly and without delay.
Where that notification is missed, the authority can recover payments going back up to four years under Section 169(2) of the Fiscal Code (Abgabenordnung, AO). In cases of gross negligence, that period extends to five years; where intentional conduct is established, it extends to ten. The sums involved can be considerable. At the current monthly rate of €259, a four-year recovery period alone produces a claim of over €12,000. Those who assume that repaying the amount brings the matter to an end may not be aware of what has already been set in motion.
Can a Kindergeld Repayment Demand Lead to Criminal Proceedings in Germany?
Because Kindergeld is classified as a tax rebate under Section 31 EStG, the Familienkasse treats unreported changes or incorrect information as potential tax evasion under Section 370 AO — a criminal offense under German law. The authority is not a standard social welfare body. It operates within the framework of German tax law and has its own dedicated criminal and penalty unit (Bußgeld- und Strafsachenstelle).
Once the Familienkasse identifies grounds for suspecting intentional conduct, it opens criminal proceedings and transfers the file to that unit. Investigators then examine whether relevant changes were deliberately concealed. It is the amount being recovered that determines the severity of the potential penalty — not whether an investigation is opened at all.
The consequences are serious. They can include significant financial penalties, an entry in the Führungszeugnis — Germany’s official certificate of good conduct, which is routinely requested by employers and public authorities — and in more serious cases a prison sentence. There is a further risk that is frequently underestimated: anyone who contacts the Familienkasse or its criminal unit without legal representation risks providing the very basis for establishing intentional conduct. Ill-considered statements or a premature acknowledgment of the facts can fundamentally damage the defense position.
Legal Defense Against Kindergeld Repayment Proceedings in Germany
A proper defense addresses the case from several angles simultaneously.
What Is the Difference Between Tax Evasion and Negligent Tax Reduction in a Kindergeld Case?
The most important legal distinction in German tax law in this context is between intentional tax evasion (Section 370 AO) and negligent tax reduction (leichtfertige Steuerverkürzung, Section 378 AO). The latter is a regulatory offense — not a criminal one — and is handled through an administrative penalty process rather than criminal proceedings. Someone who failed to notify the Familienkasse through ignorance or oversight, rather than deliberate concealment, does not face a criminal conviction. Where it is possible to demonstrate that conduct was negligent rather than intentional, criminal prosecution falls away entirely. In many cases, that is the realistic and primary defense objective.
File Inspection and Case Assessment
Before any statement is made to the authority, it is essential to establish exactly what information the Familienkasse already holds. The case file reveals which facts are known to the authority and which are not. That knowledge is the foundation of any effective defense strategy — and making statements without it carries a real risk of inadvertently providing proof of intent.
What Is a Selbstanzeige and Can It Help in a Kindergeld Case?
Where a person recognizes that they have failed to report a relevant change, and the Familienkasse has not yet opened proceedings, a voluntary disclosure (Selbstanzeige) under Section 371 AO may in limited circumstances provide protection from criminal liability. This requires complete and timely reporting of all relevant periods and full repayment of any Kindergeld received without entitlement. Once the Familienkasse has already taken action, a valid voluntary disclosure is generally no longer possible. Establishing whether this option remains open is therefore one of the first steps a defense lawyer will take.
In parallel, procedural steps can be pursued: a formal objection against the repayment demand notice within the one-month deadline, an application for suspension of enforcement to limit financial pressure during ongoing proceedings, and where applicable an application for deferral of payment or an equitable waiver in cases of demonstrable financial hardship.
What Should You Do After Receiving a Kindergeld Repayment Notice?
A repayment demand from the Familienkasse is not a matter that can be resolved by making a bank transfer. Anyone who responds without legal advice — or who volunteers information prematurely — risks providing material that can be used against them in active criminal proceedings.
On receiving correspondence from the Familienkasse or its criminal unit, the immediate priority is legal assessment, not a response. Before making any statement in writing or by telephone, or transferring any sum, the following questions need to be answered: What exactly is being alleged? What deadlines are running? Is a formal objection combined with an application for suspension of enforcement the right step to limit financial exposure during the proceedings?
Contact our defense lawyers before the Familienkasse transfers the file to the public prosecutor’s office. We review the file, assess your position, and develop a strategy focused on your interests — handled discreetly, with the clear objective of avoiding a criminal conviction.
Schlun & Elseven: Legal Support for Kindergeld Repayment Cases in Germany
A Kindergeld repayment demand can move from a routine administrative matter to a tax criminal law proceeding within a short period of time. For those without legal representation, the shift is often not visible until the situation has already escalated.
Schlun & Elseven guides clients from the initial review of the repayment notice through to the conclusion of the proceedings. The objective is consistent: to limit exposure under German tax criminal law as early as possible, to counter the allegation of intentional conduct, and to reach a discreet resolution that leaves no lasting record.
Our lawyers have extensive experience in German tax law and tax criminal law, and are familiar with how the Familienkasse and its criminal unit approach these cases. Understanding how the authority builds its case makes it possible to respond effectively and at the right time.
Those affected should not wait to see whether the Familienkasse refers the matter further. The right moment to seek legal advice is when the repayment demand arrives — not when a summons from the criminal unit appears in the letterbox.
Frequently Asked Questions relating to Kindergeld Repayment Demands from the Familienkasse
No — and this misunderstanding can have serious consequences. Because Kindergeld is classified as a tax rebate under Section 31 EStG, it falls within the scope of German tax law, including its criminal provisions. Repayment does not end the process: the Familienkasse continues to assess independently whether criminal charges for tax evasion should be pursued. The first step should not be a bank transfer but a consultation with a lawyer specializing in German tax criminal law — to review the notice, protect any applicable deadlines, and secure your position from the outset.
The Familienkasse is not a standard social welfare authority. It operates under German tax law and has its own criminal and penalty unit. As soon as it identifies an initial basis for suspecting intentional conduct, it can transfer the case internally — regardless of the amount being recovered. Unreported changes or incorrect information can then be pursued as tax evasion under Section 370 AO, with potential consequences including financial penalties, an entry in the Führungszeugnis, and in serious cases a custodial sentence.
Before any statement is made to the authority, the defense lawyer obtains full access to the case file. This establishes exactly what information the Familienkasse holds — which facts the authority knows and which it does not. Only on that basis can a sound defense strategy be developed. Making statements to the criminal unit without this information carries a real risk of inadvertently providing proof of intent.
This is strongly inadvisable. Any unguarded statement — including in what appears to be a routine phone call — can become relevant in criminal proceedings. Ill-considered explanations or a premature acknowledgment of facts are frequently the basis on which the criminal unit establishes intentional conduct. Your defense lawyer handles all communication with the authority and ensures that nothing is said that could prejudice the proceedings.
A formal objection against a repayment demand must be filed within one month. If that deadline is missed, the demand becomes enforceable. An application for suspension of enforcement can be filed in parallel, which limits the financial impact while proceedings are ongoing. Your defense lawyer secures these deadlines, initiates the appropriate procedural steps, and prevents a situation where inaction forecloses options that would otherwise remain available.
The right moment is when the repayment demand arrives — not when a summons from the criminal unit follows. The earlier a defense lawyer is involved, the more options remain available: the file can be reviewed, deadlines protected, communications managed, and a strategy developed before the authority escalates the matter. By the time the public prosecutor’s office is involved, a significant part of the defense window has already closed.
Practice Group: German Criminal Tax Law
Practice Group:
German Criminal Tax Law Cases
Contact Schlun & Elseven Rechtsanwälte
Please use our online form to outline your request to us. After receiving your request, we will make a brief initial assessment based on the facts described and provide you with a cost offer. You can then decide whether you would like to engage our services.
